Mail the Knewt?

Home

News Photos Planes The Bwlch People Jokes Knewt E-mail

                       

Scorpion Review

by Guillaume Bourély as seen in QEFI

more photies at the end...

All my models have a story; this one began at the end of June 2003.

Having enjoyed three years in South London, an opportunity to move to Cardiff came along and I grabbed it. The South Wales area is known as one of the best places in the world for slope soaring.

Unfortunately, in two years of flat field flying, most of my purchased gliders were electric sailplanes.

I could not miss out on these slopes and really had to find a model that would be suitable…this is where my search for a 60 inch pylon racer started.

The choice is very wide when it comes to 60” slopers, confusing in fact. A lot of them perform very closely and mainly their price, look and finish vary.

I knew I wanted a model that stands out from the crowd, not only by its look but also its speed and agility in the turns, with the option of adding ballast in the fuse. Browsing on the Internet and looking at competition results, I came across a model which I had never heard of before.

The Scorpion 2 seemed very popular in France and had a lot of positive feedback on French forums. Moreover, competition results of its manufacturer (Rémi Girard from CCM) spoke for themselves, reaching top places along other established 60” moldies. There is only one way I would find out what all the fuss was about…I placed an order for a Scorpion 2.

 

A tailored model

 Many versions are available from Cévennes Concept Modélisme

  • A hollow fibreglass wing (typical AUW 650 gr)
  • A hollow carbon wing (typical AUW 700 gr)
  • A foam core carbon wing (typical AUW 750 gr)

 All come with a choice of two fuselages: the so-called “short” fuselage (pure glider) and the “long” one (which can be electrified).

Because I wanted a durable and easy to repair model, I chose the foam carbon wing with a long fuse to try and keep the weight down (less balancing lead required due to the longer nose).

A very unique feature of the Scorpion 2 is that it is customized to your needs. CCM indeed tailors its models to its customers’ requirements. Whether you want flaps, a carbon fuselage or even a two-piece wing, it can all be done!

In my case, I quite fancied a colourful scheme, a precise servo tray location in the wing and some bottom hinged ailerons.

Six weeks later, an unusually big parcel came through the post and I had no doubt about its content.

 After several minutes of intense unpacking, I could finally get a first feel of the model. What seems to be the rule with moldies is that you do not get a lot for your money…and the Scorpion 2 is no rule breaker here.

However, it becomes clear why the box includes so few parts on closer inspection. The Scorpion 2 is as much ARTF as you can get: the carbon canopy is fitted with closing system installed, the wing fixation is done, all the hinges done with wipers on the ailerons, and even the Vtail is glued on the fuselage. The finish on both wing and fuselage stands the comparison with Eastern Europe’s models, even though my colour scheme is not perfect and carbon can be seen through the paint (here the Scorpion 2 reminds me of the Samba range of models that have little paint to keep the weight down).

 Some English instructions are provided; they include some advice with the components selection, some building tips and the set up of the model.

 

Did you say building?

To protect the wing’s shiny finish, I used masking tape each time I applied cyano or epoxy.

I carefully selected the components since micro servos only fit in the fuselage and some thin ones are strongly recommended in the wing. This is due to the MH43 section, which is used on pylon racers (that should be a clue regarding the speed of the model).

I decided to install two Hitec HS125MG in the wing and two Graupner C2081 that I had spare in the fuselage. They were all a drop-in and I strongly advise the use of similar components, they make the building straightforward.

As usual, I started with the fuselage, and it was clear the building would require very little effort. All I had to do was gluing the servo tray, positioning the outer snakes, and fixing the Vtail horns. Later on, I felt the need to replace the provided horns with some ball links which allowed me to achieve more throw (the throw was mechanically limited by the horns on my model).

Work on the wing was also minimalist: I did not have to cut the aileron servo wells, not only were they done with servo wires routed, but they were also reinforced with 3 layers of carbon to minimize the outer skin’s deformation! Some epoxy/micro balloon secured the HS125MGs and I used a 6 pin Multiplex plug to connect them to the receiver (but this is not the best system to choose if you intend to insert a ballast tube in the fuse).

On the top of the building tips provided by CCM, I would add that you need to push some hard foam into the fuselage between the outer snakes. Doing so ensures an accurate movement of the Vtail surfaces by preventing bending of the piano wires in the snakes.

Flying at the slope

On completion of the building, I had a smile on my face. This is an area where the Scorpion 2 succeeds, unlike a lot of models that give a headache during this necessary step.

I was feeling confident and looking forward to the maiden flight. Unfortunately, it was not until two weeks later that I was able to fly the Scorpion 2 up the Bwlch Mountain. The wind hit the Wrecker slope at a gentle 10 mph.

With the CG positioned as far aft as advised, the Scorpion 2 was launched. 826 grams of carbon and foam started flying around for the usual checks. The roll rate was excellent with the recommended throws, and to say the truth, I was surprised that it rolled much faster than other 60 inch I have flown, and the Scorpion has less aileron movement! The control surfaces have an amazing torsional stiffness indeed and the model reacts very quickly to each transmitter input. However, Kevin Newton and I found that the CG needed adjusting and the elevator throw had to be increased.

Being one of the rare twin sticks pilot in the area (transmitter in mode 1), Kevin flew the Scorpion 2 and helped me setting it up. The glider was ripping the sky in his hands and words such as “natural pace” came out. A lot of interest was shown that day, and people found the model stunning as well as nicely engineered and finished. The elliptical leading edge, the bottom hinged ailerons and the practical wing fixation were a few details pointed out by fellow fliers.

This flying session in relatively light winds (but the Wrecker does not need a lot of wind to produce smooth lift) showed a very lively behaviour and a racing ability.

The Scorpion 2’s high AUW was explained to me as the result of a new manufacturing technique. It aims at getting the same finish on hollow and foam core wings (which was not achieved before), my wing being the first of the series. A typical AUW for a Scorpion 2 with foam core wing is 750gr.

For lighter wind conditions (and thermal soaring from a flat field with the help of a bungee), I decided to order an extra hollow carbon wing, giving my Scorpion 2 a 710 grams AUW.

My newly enlightened Scorpion 2 was launched in a mere 2mph wind on the Back of the Wrecker. I was amazed that day that the model was not only staying up when other models were grounded, but also gaining height especially with the thermal setting switched on (4mm of down ailerons). I was certainly very pleased with the performance. 

Next flight occurred still at the Bwlch, this time on Mickey’s slope with very different conditions: it was this time blowing at 30mph, producing a very strong and smooth lift. I decided to fly the “light” Scorpion 2 with hollow wing and see how it coped. Considering the conditions, the Scorpion 2 was on the light side this time. To test the airframe, I tried gaining as much height as possible, and then dive full speed followed by a huge loop. It was rock solid and using the Snap Flap mix (5mm of down ailerons at full elevator throw) helped tightening the loops. I put the model through its paces that day and felt the Scorpion 2 would withstand high loads, making it suitable for DS (and I can confirm light DS has successfully been tried by Kevin, reaching speeds of around 70mph). Landing in these conditions was also a non-event, the Scorpion 2 reacting very quickly to every input on the transmitter. Some up ailerons (20 mm) mixed with down elevator (2mm) help coming down however.

I have had many flights with the Scorpion 2 since and have always felt very little need for the rudder. I fly my “light” model with more confidence than my “heavy” one because it stays up when the wind goes down. I usually fly the foam core wing in 15mph+ winds to act as a ballasted model: the Scorpion 2 becomes much faster and livelier but is less tolerant if the wind goes down. I found that landing the 826gr version was still a non-event using the same mixes. I set up +15mm/-10mm on the ailerons with a Dual Rate at 60% for thermal flying and DSing. I have set the CG at 60mm from the Leading Edge but I feel more experienced flyers will have it further aft.

And from…flat field

I have always liked all-round models, and because not everyone is lucky enough to live next to a slope, I decided to see how the Scorpion 2 performed from flat field.

I am not a very skilled soarer but thermals seem to find me somehow. I fitted a hook to the fuselage and I was off to my local field. I have catapulted a few different models in the past and this has always been a unique experience. The energy retained is phenomenal and allows vertical climbs: the aim of catapulting is to gain as much speed (hence energy) as possible and convert it into height upon release of the model. I found that using the thermal setting (5mm of down ailerons) as the Scorpion 2 came off the bungee helped a lot in this goal. In no thermal activity, I managed some flight of over 1 minute. But I would think that a skilled pilot would easily reach twice as much, and even more in thermal activity.

A different model

Do I feel that the Scorpion 2 is a different model? If I consider it was made to my specifications, only took a few hours to build, flies great and is very durable, my answer is definitely yes.

I like the unusual wing fixation system because it is neat and reliable; I also feel that the wing would pop off in the event of a big crash.

I should also say that I have had the chance to test the model’s durability during a failed landing resulting in a cartwheel: the fuselage hardly had any damage and the model was back in the air in no time.

60 inch slopers are very good performers and very enjoyable, so it is important to choose the right model that will not spoil your day after a less than perfect landing.

But I was not only after a durable fast model during my quest for a 60-inch, I also wanted a stunning glider that people would stare at on the ground as well as airborne. All I can say is that the Scorpion 2 fulfilled all my requirements.

Model: Scorpion 2

Manufacturer: Cévennes Concept Modélisme (www.ccm-rc.com)

Distributor: European Sailplanes/ Soaring USA

Size: 60 inches (1.52 m)

AUW: 640/760 gr depending on version

Wing section: MH43

Servos: 2 x Hitec HS125MG in the wing and 2 x Graupner C2081 in the fuselage

Receiver: Hitec Micro 555 Dual Conversion

Receiver pack: 4 cells of HE1100 NiMh

Construction: Fully moulded with a choice of a hollow or a foam core wing